Category: Trump Administration

  • Who’s Going to Tell the Powerful “No?”

    Who’s Going to Tell the Powerful “No?”

    The Supreme Court just handed presidents more power over independent watchdog agencies.

    Some people will tell you this is an argument about constitutional law.

    No.

    It’s an argument about who stands between ordinary people and powerful institutions when something goes wrong.

    There is a reason agencies like the Federal Trade Commission exist.

    There is a reason the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau exists.

    There is a reason we created watchdogs in the first place.

    Because history has already answered the question of what happens when we simply trust powerful people and corporations to police themselves.

    People get hurt.

    Homes are lost.

    Savings disappear.

    Families spend years digging out of holes they never saw coming.

    I’ve watched people walk in believing they just needed a little more time.

    One missed payment.

    Maybe two.

    They thought if they could just catch up next month, everything would be fine.

    That’s not how it works.

    Interest doesn’t stop because life happened.

    The unpaid interest continues to accrue. The balance grows. Fees may be added. The amount needed to become current gets larger while the family’s ability to catch up often gets smaller.

    Suddenly they aren’t trying to make one payment.

    They’re trying to catch two.

    Then three.

    The hole gets deeper every month.

    By the time many people finally ask for help, they aren’t looking for a miracle.

    They’re looking for any option.

    Sometimes there wasn’t one.

    Sometimes the conversation became:

    “I’m sorry… your choices are a short sale, a forbearance agreement if you qualify, or voluntary foreclosure.”

    Those aren’t conversations anyone ever forgets.

    The CFPB wasn’t created because government wanted another agency.

    It was created because millions of Americans learned the hard way what happens when the financial system has too few guardrails and too little accountability.

    The FTC wasn’t created because corporations volunteered to play fair.

    It was created because too many didn’t.

    Independent watchdogs exist for one reason:

    To tell powerful people “No.”

    To tell companies they can’t deceive consumers.

    To tell banks they can’t ignore the rules.

    To tell corporations they can’t simply do whatever makes the most money and worry about the consequences later.

    Today’s Supreme Court decision isn’t just about who gets to fire agency leaders.

    It’s about whether the people responsible for protecting the public can do their jobs without wondering whether keeping those jobs depends on pleasing the people in power.

    Because when watchdogs become less independent, history suggests the people most likely to pay the price aren’t the executives.

    They aren’t the lobbyists.

    They aren’t the politicians.

    They’re the families sitting around the kitchen table wondering how one setback turned into losing everything.

    That’s why watchdogs exist.

    Not because government is perfect.

    Because people aren’t.

    And neither are corporations.

    Scarlett says no.

  • You Can’t Afford a House

    You Can’t Afford a House

    He’s Using Housing as a Bargaining Chip

    Millions of Americans are getting crushed by housing costs.

    Rent is too high.

    Mortgage payments are too high.

    Starter homes are disappearing.

    Big investors are buying up neighborhoods like houses are Pokémon cards.

    Young families are realizing the math isn’t mathing.

    And then…

    A miracle.

    Congress actually agreed on something.

    Not a little something.

    A real bipartisan housing bill.

    The 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act passed the Senate 85-5 and the House 358-32.

    That isn’t “barely passed.

    That’s Congress practically shouting, “We have a housing crisis. Let’s do something.”

    And then Donald Trump refused to sign it.

    Not because the bill was too expensive.

    Not because it wouldn’t work.

    Not because he suddenly developed a passion for housing policy somewhere between another round of golf and apparently falling asleep at the G7 Summit.

    I guess “Sleepy Joe” wasn’t a diagnosis. It was projection.

    No.

    He refused to sign it unless Congress first passed his unrelated SAVE Act.

    Housing.

    For voting.

    Because apparently if millions of Americans need help buying or renting a home, that’s just another bargaining chip.

    What in the flip?

    Here’s What He’s Holding Hostage

    Whether you’re a renter, a first-time homebuyer, a veteran, or just wondering why your kids can’t afford to move out — this bill was written with you in mind.

    This bill won’t solve the housing crisis overnight.

    Nobody claims it will.

    But it would actually move the ball in the right direction.

    It helps communities build more housing.

    Because when there aren’t enough homes, prices go up.

    This isn’t complicated.

    It cracks down on large investors buying thousands of single-family homes that should be available to families trying to buy their first house.

    It helps convert vacant office buildings into housing instead of letting them sit empty while people struggle to find somewhere they can afford to live.

    It expands manufactured and modular housing, making it easier to build quality homes faster and at lower cost.

    It supports veterans, rural communities, affordable housing initiatives, and programs designed to help increase the housing supply.

    In other words…

    It actually tries to do something.

    Imagine that!

    This Is Why People Hate Politics

    This is the part that drives people crazy.

    When Congress actually works together…

    When Republicans and Democrats agree on something.

    When they finally pass legislation that could HELP ordinary Americans…

    Washington decides to use it as leverage for something completely unrelated.

    Not because the housing bill is bad.

    Not because families don’t need homes.

    Not because veterans don’t deserve affordable housing.

    Because — well, politics.

    Meanwhile, first-time buyers are giving up.

    Renters are paying half their paycheck just to keep a roof over their heads.

    Young adults are moving back in with their parents because buying a starter home has become a fantasy.

    And Washington is playing, “I’ll help you… if you give me what I want first.”

    Housing isn’t a poker chip.

    Families shouldn’t be collateral damage.

    And if Congress finally manages to pass something that might actually help people find a place to live????

    Sign the damn bill.

    Scarlett says no.


    Want to Read It Yourself?

    I always encourage people to verify what they’re reading—even when it’s me.

    Official Congressional Resources

    •  Bill Summary

    •  Full Bill Text⁠


  • When Did Belonging Become a Competition?

    When Did Belonging Become a Competition?

    America teaches children to scream “we’re number one” before it teaches them how to belong.

    What in the flip?

    Be the best.

    Beat the rest.

    Win the game.

    Make the team.

    Get the trophy.

    Get picked.

    Get ranked.

    Get ahead.

    And then we act shocked when people grow up believing their worth depends on being chosen.

    Scarlett loves effort. She loves excellence. She loves watching people push themselves and discover what they’re capable of.

    But there is a difference between encouraging people to grow and teaching them that second place means second-class.

    That is where the damage starts.

    Because here’s what is not on the pep rally banner —

    Most people will not be number one.

    Most kids will not be the star athlete.

    Most students will not be valedictorian.

    Most workers will not be the top producer.

    Most people will spend their lives doing ordinary, necessary, beautiful things that hold families, workplaces, neighborhoods, schools, and communities together.

    And somehow we teach them to feel like that is not enough.

    That is the part Scarlett cannot stand.

    Not everyone wants to be famous.

    Not everyone wants to dominate.

    Not everyone wants to crush the competition.

    Some people just want to belong.

    They want to be included.

    They want to be needed.

    They want to know they matter even when they are not winning, performing, producing, ranking, proving, and auditioning for basic human worth.

    And honestly?

    That should not be a radical request.

    The world does not run because everyone is the best.

    It runs because people show up.

    They help.

    They teach.

    They coach.

    They clean.

    They drive.

    They listen.

    They organize.

    They care.

    They stay.

    Competition has its place.

    But when a culture worships winning too much, it starts treating belonging like something people have to earn.

    You belong if you win.

    You belong if you stand out.

    You belong if someone chooses you.

    No.

    People need belonging before they can become their best.

    Not after.

    Scarlett says no to a world where everyone is taught to climb over each other just to feel worthy.

    Maybe the better question is not “are you number one?”

    Maybe it is this —

    Are the people around you glad you are on the team?

  • Children With Disabilities Are Not Paperwork

    Children With Disabilities Are Not Paperwork

    The Trump administration is moving special education oversight out of the Department of Education and into Health and Human Services.

    Supporters call it reorganization.

    Parents call it something else.

    Because when a child needs help, the question is not which federal agency handles the paperwork.

    The question is whether that child gets the services they need.

    And that is where Scarlett gets pissed.

    Scarlett has a granddaughter on the autism spectrum.

    She does not know exactly what support her granddaughter will need as she grows.

    She does not know what challenges she will face.

    But she knows this:

    Her granddaughter deserves every opportunity to become whoever she is capable of becoming.

    And that opportunity should not depend on how much money her parents have.

    Because here is the ugly truth nobody wants to talk about:

    When public support systems are weakened, wealthy families still find a way.

    They hire specialists.

    They pay for private evaluations.

    They pay for tutors.

    They pay for therapies.

    They pay for advocates.

    They pay for private schools designed specifically for children with additional needs.

    Someone close to Scarlett has a grandson who requires specialized educational support. His parents are fortunate enough to afford a private school designed to meet those needs.

    Good.

    Every child deserves that kind of support.

    But what about the families who cannot write those checks?

    What about the single mother working two jobs?

    What about the grandparents raising grandchildren?

    What about the parents already choosing between rent, groceries, prescriptions, and gas?

    What happens to their children?

    Because those children deserve the same opportunity to succeed.

    Scarlett’s own children benefited from IEPs and educational support because ADHD was part of their family’s story.

    And yes, Scarlett knows exactly what some people are thinking.

    ADHD?

    Scarlett?

    No.

    Surely not the woman with a demanding full-time job, a real life outside of Scarleting, 47 tabs open, three causes on fire, a missing password, a half-written post, an unanswered text, laundry judging her from the corner, and a sudden urgent need to reorganize a website menu at midnight.

    Shocking.

    But when Scarlett was a kid, nobody knew what the heck ADHD was.

    There were no IEP meetings.

    There were no accommodations.

    There were no conversations about executive functioning, learning differences, or how smart kids can still struggle.

    There was “sit still.”

    There was “pay attention.”

    There was “try harder.”

    And in Catholic school, there was sometimes a yardstick.

    Scarlett is not romanticizing that. She is condemning it.

    Because a lot of children were punished for things adults did not understand, did not support, or did not want to deal with.

    Scarlett still remembers getting whacked across the knees because her skirt was a little too short.

    Every Friday for most of seventh and all of eighth grade.

    The crime?

    Having a skirt that was more than 3 inches above her knee.

    The culprit?

    According to the school, the child wearing the uniform.

    Not the parent who bought it.

    Not the family budget.

    Not the fact that children have the audacity to grow.

    The child.

    Ah yes.

    The educational philosophy of the era seemed to be: when in doubt, blame the kid.

    That was not discipline.

    That was adults taking their frustration, control, and ignorance out on a child.

    And yes, here is another hidden connection to Scarlett’s abortion article.

    Because this is the same pattern.

    Force the birth.

    Police the child.

    Punish the parent.

    Ignore the poverty.

    Blame the kid.

    Then act shocked when people say the system was never really pro-life at all.

    Children are not born into equal circumstances.

    Some are born into families with money, time, advocates, access, transportation, flexibility, private specialists, and backup plans.

    Others are born into families doing the absolute best they can while barely keeping the lights on.

    That child’s future should not depend on which family they got dropped into.

    That is why special education matters.

    That is why IEPs matter.

    That is why public schools matter.

    That is why federal protections matter.

    That is why Federal Pell Grants matter. Or better yet, some form of universal secondary education.

    Because support does not make a child less capable.

    It helps the world finally see what was already there.

    Scarlett’s children didn’t succeed because someone lowered the bar.

    They succeeded because someone finally understood what they needed to clear it.

    And they succeeded because they had a mother in their corner.

    A mother who believed in them.

    A mother who pushed for them.

    A mother who sat through meetings, asked questions, challenged decisions, and occasionally became a royal pain in the ass when she thought someone was overlooking her kids.

    A mother who sometimes fought battles for them that, looking back, she probably should have let them fight themselves.

    But when you are a parent and you see your child struggling, you do not always get that balance right.

    You just fight.

    Because children need systems that work.

    But they also need adults who will fight like hell when those systems don’t.

    And if we make it harder for families to access services, harder to enforce protections, and harder to hold schools accountable, the children who suffer will not be the wealthy ones.

    The wealthy will find another option.

    The children who suffer will be the ones whose families do not have one.

    Children with disabilities are not paperwork.

    They are not budget items.

    They are not political talking points.

    They are children.

    And they deserve better than this.

    Scarlett says no.

  • Trump’s Name Is Being Removed From the Kennedy

    Trump’s Name Is Being Removed From the Kennedy

    Turns out you cannot just slap your name on a national cultural institution because your ego needs more square footage.

    Workers are removing Donald Trump’s name from the Kennedy Center after a federal judge ruled that the Trump-controlled board did not have the legal authority to rename the building.

    That’s right….A national memorial honoring President John F. Kennedy was renamed after Donald Trump.

    Not by Congress.

    Not by the American people.

    Not because of some overwhelming public demand.

    Just because people with power decided that apparently every building, airport, golf course, and flat surface in America should eventually have Trump’s name on it.

    And now the letters are coming down.

    This Is About More Than a Sign

    The Kennedy Center does not belong to Donald Trump.

    It does not belong to his board.

    It does not belong to whichever political party happens to be in power.

    It belongs to the American people.

    That is why the court stepped in.

    Because public institutions are not personal trophies.

    Imagine if every president simply renamed national landmarks after themselves.

    The Lincoln Memorial becomes the Obama Memorial.

    The Washington Monument becomes the Bush Monument.

    The Statue of Liberty becomes whatever billionaire happened to be writing checks that week.

    Most Americans would immediately recognize how ridiculous that sounds.

    Yet somehow we are supposed to pretend this situation was perfectly normal.

    The Ego Never Stops

    This is the part that always amazes me.

    There are more than 600 Trump-branded properties around the world.

    Hotels.

    Golf courses.

    Residential towers.

    Resorts.

    Licensing deals.

    Merchandise.

    Books.

    Coins.

    NFTs.

    Shoes.

    Apparently that was still not enough.

    At some point the question stops being “Why are people taking the name down?”

    And becomes:

    “Why was it there in the first place?”

    The Workers Deserve an Award

    Somewhere in Washington, workers showed up with scaffolding, tools, and a court order.

    Honestly, they may be the heroes of the week.

    Because there is something beautifully symbolic about watching actual working people undo something powerful people never should have done.

    One letter at a time.

    One bolt at a time.

    One giant ego adjustment at a time.

    The Lesson

    Rules matter.

    Laws matter.

    Public institutions matter.

    And no matter how powerful someone becomes, they do not get to turn national landmarks into vanity projects.

    The letters are coming down.

    The court has spoken.

    The building survives.

    The republic survives.

    And somewhere, a tarp is doing the Lord’s work.

    What in the flip?

    Scarlett says no.

  • The Apache Crash Was Still Under Investigation.

    The Apache Crash Was Still Under Investigation.

    The Strikes Had Already Begun.

    Two American soldiers survived a terrifying helicopter crash near the Strait of Hormuz. Thank goodness. But Americans deserve to know why the military response moved faster than the public explanation.

    On June 8, a U.S. Army AH-64 Apache helicopter went down near the coast of Oman while patrolling regional waters.

    The two soldiers on board were rescued within approximately two hours. They were reported to be in stable condition.

    That is the good news.

    The deeply troubling part is what happened next.

    U.S. Central Command announced that the cause of the incident was still under investigation.

    Then, on June 9, CENTCOM announced that the United States had completed strikes against Iranian air-defense systems, ground-control stations, and surveillance-radar sites near the Strait of Hormuz. CENTCOM described the strikes as a response to Iran’s downing of the helicopter and to recent attacks on U.S. forces and commercial ships.

    Apparently, the investigation was still open, but the missiles did not need to wait for the paperwork.

    What Do We Actually Know?

    A U.S. official told Reuters that the Apache had been brought down by an Iranian one-way attack drone.

    Iran disputed that account. Iranian state media cited a military source claiming that the country had not conducted offensive air operations in the Strait of Hormuz during the previous 24 hours.

    President Donald Trump then added his own dramatic description, telling reporters that an Iranian “bomb” had lodged inside the helicopter without exploding.

    Perhaps every detail of that account will ultimately be confirmed.

    Perhaps it will not.

    That is precisely why investigations exist.

    The American people should not have to piece together the justification for military escalation from an official press release, an unnamed source, a presidential monologue, and conflicting accounts from a hostile foreign government.

    Questions Are Not Betrayal

    There is a predictable response whenever anyone asks uncomfortable questions about military action.

    Why are you defending Iran?

    Why do you hate the troops?

    Why can’t you just trust the president?

    Please.

    Demanding accurate information before a conflict widens is not defending Iran. It is defending American service members who may be sent into an increasingly dangerous situation. It is defending civilians who do not get to opt out when bombs begin falling. It is defending the public’s right to understand what is being done in our name.

    The two soldiers aboard that Apache deserved a rescue mission. They deserved the full weight of the United States military working to bring them home safely.

    They also deserve leaders who do not treat their terrifying experience as a convenient blank check for escalation.

    Americans Have Seen This Movie Before

    This country has learned, repeatedly and painfully, what happens when certainty is announced before the evidence is fully explained.

    A military response can trigger retaliation.

    Retaliation can trigger another response.

    Oil prices rise. Gas prices rise. Markets react. Families feel the consequences. Service members are placed in greater danger. Civilians thousands of miles away pay with their lives.

    And suddenly the public is being told that asking how we got here is somehow unpatriotic.

    No.

    When a helicopter goes down and American soldiers are endangered, Americans deserve the truth.

    When military strikes follow, Americans deserve even more of it.

    Not eventually.

    Not after the story changes three times.

    Before the next round of escalation begins.

    What in the flip?

  • Trump “Loves” Inflation

    Trump “Loves” Inflation

    While Families Pay 40.5% More for Gas

    Apparently, rising prices are delightful when you are not the person standing at the gas pump watching the numbers spin.

    Inflation climbed to 4.2% in May, the highest annual rate in three years. Prices rose another 0.5% in a single month. Energy costs increased 23.5% over the past year. Gasoline prices jumped 40.5%.

    And President Donald Trump’s response?

    “I love the inflation.”

    Yes. He actually said that.

    Trump later tried to explain that he believed the numbers were better than expected given the war with Iran. But ordinary people do not pay their bills with presidential spin. They pay them with actual money. And every dollar spent filling the tank is a dollar that cannot be spent on groceries, rent, childcare, medications, or the electric bill.

    Inflation Is Not an Abstract Number

    Inflation is often discussed as though it is a political scoreboard.

    It is not.

    It is the parent wondering whether the family can afford the summer road trip they already promised the kids.

    It is the worker whose commute suddenly costs substantially more, even though the paycheck did not magically grow with the gas bill.

    It is the small business owner paying more for deliveries and trying to decide whether to raise prices or absorb another hit.

    It is the retiree watching a fixed income stretch a little less every month.

    The latest government report shows that the pain is not limited to gasoline. Energy prices rose sharply in May, while shelter costs, airline fares, medical care, personal care, and recreation also increased. Food prices rose 3.1% over the past year.

    The Gas Pump Does Not Care About Political Excuses

    The White House argues that the rising costs are temporary disruptions related to the Iran conflict and that prices will fall when the situation is resolved. Perhaps they will. Families certainly hope so.

    But this administration does not get to treat a 40.5% increase in gasoline prices like an interesting little inconvenience.

    People remember being promised lower prices.

    They remember being told that affordability would improve.

    They remember hearing that everything would be fixed quickly and easily.

    Now they are being told to celebrate inflation because it could have been worse.

    That is not a solution. That is a shrug from people who do not feel the consequences the way ordinary families do.

    Read the Room

    A president saying that he “loves” inflation while millions of people are paying more for basic necessities is not merely a clumsy choice of words.

    It reveals a much larger problem.

    Too many powerful people experience economic pain as a press-conference question. Everyone else experiences it when the debit card is declined, when the credit-card balance grows, or when one more ordinary expense becomes something that has to wait until payday.

    Families are not asking for a victory lap.

    They are asking how they are supposed to absorb another round of rising prices.

    What in the flip?

  • War Crimes Are Not Complicated

    War Crimes Are Not Complicated

    Every time a war dominates the news, the same arguments appear.

    “What about what the other side did?”

    “They started it.”

    “They deserve it.”

    “They had it coming.”

    That’s not how war crimes work.

    In fact, the entire reason international law exists is because human beings discovered what happens when armies, governments, and leaders convince themselves that anything is justified if they hate the enemy enough.

    The rules are actually pretty simple.

    Don’t deliberately target civilians.

    Don’t torture people.

    Don’t rape people.

    Don’t execute prisoners.

    Don’t kidnap children.

    Don’t starve entire populations.

    Don’t take hostages.

    Don’t use human shields.

    Don’t bomb hospitals, schools, or humanitarian workers.

    Don’t force people from their homes because of who they are.

    These aren’t controversial ideas.

    They aren’t partisan ideas.

    They aren’t liberal ideas or conservative ideas.

    They’re human ideas.

    The world spent centuries watching governments commit atrocities and finally agreed that there had to be limits, even during war.

    Especially during war.

    The problem is that people often support these rules only when their enemies are accused of breaking them.

    The moment someone on their “team” is accused, the conversation changes.

    Suddenly there are excuses.

    Suddenly there are exceptions.

    Suddenly civilian deaths become statistics.

    Suddenly starving children becomes strategy.

    Suddenly human suffering becomes collateral damage.

    No.

    The rules either apply to everyone or they apply to no one.

    If deliberately killing civilians is wrong when your enemy does it, it’s wrong when your side does it.

    If kidnapping children is wrong when your enemy does it, it’s wrong when your side does it.

    If starvation, torture, rape, and collective punishment are wrong, they’re wrong regardless of which flag is flying overhead.

    That is the entire point.

    War crimes are not complicated.

    What’s complicated is people’s willingness to overlook them when they’re committed by someone they support.

    Scarlett says no.