Author: Scarlett SaysNo

  • Parents, Check the Toy Bin: LiKee Teething Toys Recalled Over Choking Risk

    Parents, Check the Toy Bin: LiKee Teething Toys Recalled Over Choking Risk

    A baby teething toy sold on Amazon has been recalled because it can create a serious choking hazard.

    LiKee Pull String Teething Toys, sold by ChilanTech on Amazon, are being recalled because the silicone strings are smaller and longer than federal toy safety standards allow. That matters because those strings can reach the back of a child’s throat and become lodged.

    That is not a “minor product issue.” That is a respiratory distress and deadly choking hazard.

    According to the CPSC, the company has received 10 reports of the toy’s strings reaching the back of a child’s throat, resulting in respiratory distress or choking.

    The recalled toy is an off-white disc-shaped teething toy with a blue ball in the center, six colorful silicone pull strings, and three soft push buttons. The packaging says “Baby Sensory Toy” and lists model number LK-FDWJ.

    The toy was sold on Amazon.com from November 2024 through December 2025 for about $10.

    What Parents Should Do

    Stop using the toy immediately.

    Take it away from children.

    Contact ChilanTech for a free replacement toy. Consumers are being asked to destroy the toy by cutting the silicone tentacles, writing “Recalled” on the main body with permanent marker, and sending a photo of the destroyed product to likee-teether-recall@outlook.com.

    Then throw it away.

    Because when a toy meant for teething can reach the back of a child’s throat, the answer is not “keep an eye on it.”

    The answer is get it out of the house.


  • Hasuit 7-Drawer Dresser Recall: Tip-Over Hazard Poses Risk of Serious Injury or Death

    Hasuit 7-Drawer Dresser Recall: Tip-Over Hazard Poses Risk of Serious Injury or Death

    A recall has been issued for certain Hasuit 7-Drawer Dressers sold on Amazon because they can tip over if not properly anchored, creating a risk of serious injury or death, especially to children. The dressers also present an entrapment hazard and do not meet federal safety requirements for clothing storage units.

    Consumers should stop using the recalled dressers immediately if they are not anchored and follow the manufacturer’s recall instructions.


  • Nara Infant Formula Recalled Over Possible Botulism Risk

    Nara Infant Formula Recalled Over Possible Botulism Risk

    Parents, Check Your Formula Shelf

    Nara Organics has recalled all lots of its powdered infant formula because of a possible contamination risk linked to Clostridium botulinum, the bacteria that can cause infant botulism.

    Infant botulism is rare, but it can be devastating. Symptoms may include constipation, poor feeding, a weak cry, loss of head control, difficulty swallowing, and breathing problems. In severe cases, it can be life-threatening.

    Parents already spend enough time worrying about whether their babies are eating, sleeping, growing, and thriving. They should not have to wonder whether the formula they purchased could put their child at risk.

    The recall affects all lots of Nara Organics Powdered Infant Formula currently on the market. Consumers should stop using the product immediately and review the manufacturer’s recall instructions.

    What Parents Should Do

    • Stop using the recalled formula immediately.
    • Check lot information and recall details.
    • Contact your pediatrician if your child has consumed the formula and is experiencing symptoms.
    • Follow the manufacturer’s instructions regarding refunds or replacement products.

    Food and infant product recalls are exactly why consumer safety standards exist. When products intended for the youngest and most vulnerable consumers may pose a risk, parents deserve clear information and immediate action.

    Scarlett will continue monitoring recalls, FDA alerts, and consumer safety warnings so you don’t have to spend your day digging through government websites.


  • I Took This Photo in 2024. Yesterday, Russia Struck the Same Historic Site.

    I Took This Photo in 2024. Yesterday, Russia Struck the Same Historic Site.

    When my children were grown, moved out, and I finally had both the time and financial ability to travel, I used to say something that sounded dramatic:

    I wanted to see the world while there was still a world to see.

    War.

    Famine.

    Natural disasters.

    Human stupidity.

    Pick your category.

    My fear was that places on my bucket list would disappear before I ever had the chance to stand in them.

    Not because time passed.

    But because people destroyed them.

    In 2024, I stood at Kyiv Pechersk Lavra in Ukraine and took this photo.

    Yesterday, Russia struck the same historic religious complex.

    And I cannot stop thinking about it.

    Because this is exactly what I meant.

    The places we dream of visiting do not exist in a protective bubble waiting for us to arrive.

    They are vulnerable.

    To bombs.

    To fire.

    To politics.

    To greed.

    To indifference.

    To people who think destruction is easier than preservation.

    Kyiv Pechersk Lavra was founded in 1051.

    Nearly a thousand years ago.

    People prayed there before the United States existed.

    Before modern Russia existed.

    Before most of the borders people argue about today had even been imagined.

    For centuries, people have gathered there to worship, celebrate, mourn, and remember.

    Empires rose.

    Empires fell.

    Wars came and went.

    Governments changed.

    The Lavra remained.

    When I visited, I saw tourists taking photographs.

    Families walking together.

    Worshippers lighting candles.

    Grandparents holding children’s hands.

    Ordinary people living ordinary lives around an extraordinary place.

    And that’s what I wish more people understood when they talk about Ukraine.

    Far too often, the conversation sounds like a business negotiation.

    A land deal.

    A dispute over territory.

    A line on a map.

    As if giving away part of a country is no different than redrawing property boundaries.

    But a country is not just land.

    It’s churches.

    It’s schools.

    It’s neighborhoods.

    It’s cemeteries.

    It’s language.

    It’s culture.

    It’s history.

    It’s memories.

    It’s the places where people fell in love, got married, raised children, buried parents, and built lives.

    It’s the places that tell people who they are.

    Yesterday’s strike damaged a cathedral.

    But the cathedral isn’t really the point.

    The point is what disappears when people stop seeing places as homes and start seeing them as bargaining chips.

    The point is what gets lost when history becomes collateral damage.

    The point is that every missile destroys more than a building.

    It destroys pieces of a story that can never be recreated exactly as they were before.

    I look at this photograph differently today.

    At the time, it was simply a travel photo.

    Today, it feels like evidence.

    Proof that I stood in a place that survived nearly a thousand years and still wasn’t safe from the choices of people living in the present.

    When I started traveling, I said I wanted to see the world while there was still a world to see.

    Standing in Kyiv in 2024, I didn’t realize how literal that statement would become.

    Because the greatest threat to the places we treasure isn’t time.

    It’s the belief that they’ll always be there tomorrow.

    Sometimes they aren’t.

  • Scarlett’s Granddaughters Have Fewer Rights Than She Did

    Scarlett’s Granddaughters Have Fewer Rights Than She Did

    Every now and then, Scarlett wonders where she would be today if she had not had an abortion in her 20s.

    Not because she regrets it.

    Not because she is looking for forgiveness.

    And certainly not because she owes strangers an explanation.

    She wonders because one decision can change the entire direction of a life.

    A different job.

    A different city.

    Different relationships.

    Different opportunities.

    Maybe different children.

    Maybe a completely different version of Scarlett.

    She will never know.

    That is the thing about life.

    You only get to live one version of it.

    The loudest people in the abortion debate always seem convinced they know exactly what would have happened.

    They do not.

    Neither does Scarlett.

    Maybe her life would have been better.

    Maybe it would have been harder.

    Maybe both.

    If Scarlett is being honest, she believes she made the right decision.

    More than that, she believes her life was better because she made it.

    She believes her family’s life was better because she made it.

    The opportunities she had.

    The people she loved.

    The children she eventually raised.

    The grandchildren she adores.

    None of it exists exactly as it does today without that choice.

    But certainty is a funny thing.

    Because Scarlett will never know.

    There is no alternate universe she can visit.

    No second life she can compare against this one.

    Only the life she lived.

    The one she built.

    The one she (mostly) loves.

    And the one she was free to choose.

    But she knows one thing for certain:

    The decision was hers.

    And that matters.

    While Scarlett was a child, abortion became legal.

    Women before her fought for that right.

    Not because they loved abortion.

    Not because they celebrated it.

    Not because they wanted anyone to have one.

    They fought because they understood something painfully basic:

    A woman should own her own future.

    She should decide whether she is ready.

    She should decide what risks she is willing to take.

    She should decide what path her life follows.

    Not politicians.

    Not judges.

    Not preachers.

    Not strangers.

    Her.

    By the time Scarlett was old enough to face that decision, that right existed.

    When one of the biggest crossroads of her life arrived, Scarlett was allowed to choose.

    Today, Scarlett’s granddaughters have fewer rights than she did.

    After decades of progress.

    Scarlett’s GRANDDAUGHTERS have fewer rights than she did.

    After generations of women fought, marched, voted, organized, argued, and sacrificed.

    SCARLETT’S GRANDDAUGHTERS HAVE FEWER RIGHTS THAN SHE DID.

    We are now debating whether young women deserve the same freedom their grandmothers had.

    What in the flip kind of progress is that?

    And before anyone says, “Well, adoption is always an option,” Scarlett would like a word.

    She was adopted.

    So yes, she knows adoption can be a beautiful answer.

    Scarlett had a classmate who was also adopted.  That friend’s parents told her she was chosen.

    Chosen.

    They said it so she would know she was loved.

    Wanted.

    Welcomed.

    That is one version of adoption.

    Scarlett had another.

    When her mother was angry about whatever normal childhood behavior had pushed the wrong button that day, she would remind Scarlett she should be grateful to have a roof over her head.

    Grateful she was not in foster care.  Grateful for private school.  Just flipping grateful.

    Imagine being a child and learning that love could come with a bill.

    Imagine learning that shelter could be used as a weapon.

    Imagine learning that belonging could be conditional if you were inconvenient enough.

    So please spare Scarlett the neat little adoption speeches.

    Adoption may be an answer.

    It is not the answer.

    Not for every woman.

    Not for every pregnancy.

    Not for every child.

    Not for every life.

    The people shouting “just put the baby up for adoption” are usually not volunteering to carry the pregnancy, endure the birth, navigate the trauma, pay the bills, or live with the consequences.

    Imagine.

    You do not have to agree with Scarlett’s decision.

    That was never the point.

    The point is that it was hers.

    No politician knew her circumstances.

    No judge knew her fears.

    No activist knew her future.

    And none of them had to live with the consequences.

    Scarlett did.

    That is what freedom means.

    The right to make profoundly personal decisions for yourself.

    The right to succeed because of them.

    The right to struggle because of them.

    The right to own them.

    So yes, Scarlett sometimes thinks about the life she did not live.

    But she spends a lot more time thinking about the young women whose futures are being decided by people they will never meet.

    And that makes her angry.

    Because every woman deserves ownership of her own future.

    Scarlett had that right.

    Our granddaughters should have it too.

    Scarlett says no.

  • Everyone Thinks Disability Is Something That Happens to Other People

    Everyone Thinks Disability Is Something That Happens to Other People

    Until it happens to them.

    A relatively new independent film called Special Needs Revolt! imagines a future where people with disabilities are stripped of their rights and pushed to the margins of society.

    It’s satire.

    It’s fiction.

    It’s exaggerated.

    At least that’s what we’d like to think.

    Because history suggests something else.

    History suggests that every generation finds a group of people it is comfortable underestimating.

    People it decides are less capable.

    Less valuable.

    Less deserving of a voice.

    And history also suggests those groups eventually get tired of it.

    What struck me about this movie isn’t the plot.

    It’s the assumption underneath it.

    The assumption that disability belongs to someone else.

    Some other family.

    Some other neighborhood.

    Some other life.

    But disability isn’t a niche issue.

    It’s one of the few communities that almost anyone can join at any time.

    A car accident.

    A stroke.

    A cancer diagnosis.

    A traumatic brain injury.

    A child born with different needs.

    A parent developing dementia.

    Enough birthdays.

    That’s it.

    Welcome to the club.

    Which is why I’ve never understood why we talk about disability as if it affects only a small group of people.

    It affects all of us.

    Directly.

    Indirectly.

    Today.

    Or eventually.

    And yet society still tends to measure people by what they can’t do instead of what they can.

    We see a wheelchair before we see a person.

    A diagnosis before we see talent.

    A limitation before we see potential.

    That’s not a disability problem.

    That’s a perspective problem.

    I’ve met people with disabilities who contribute more to their communities than people with every advantage imaginable.

    I’ve also met perfectly healthy people who spend their lives convincing themselves that other people are the problem.

    The difference isn’t ability.

    It’s opportunity.

    It’s inclusion.

    It’s whether someone was given the chance to participate in the first place.

    That’s why stories like Special Needs Revolt! matter.

    Not because they’re comfortable.

    Because they’re uncomfortable.

    They force us to ask who gets included.

    Who gets heard.

    Who gets ignored.

    And who gets underestimated.

    Personally, I’ve learned that underestimating people is almost always a mistake.

    Especially when society has been doing it for generations.

    Scarlett says no.

    To writing people off.

    To defining people by a diagnosis.

    And to pretending disability is somebody else’s issue.

  • Valencia Reminded Me That Life Doesn’t Have to Be a Race

    Valencia Reminded Me That Life Doesn’t Have to Be a Race

    Americans are obsessed with being busy.

    We eat in our cars.

    We answer emails during dinner.

    We brag about working ourselves into exhaustion as if it’s some kind of achievement.

    Then I visited Valencia.

    My former au pair lives there now, so instead of seeing the city through the eyes of a tourist, I got to experience it through the eyes of someone who actually calls it home.

    And one of the first things I noticed was that life seemed to happen differently there.

    Dinner wasn’t rushed.

    In fact, dinner often didn’t even start until many Americans were already winding down for the night.

    Families gathered together.

    Friends lingered over meals.

    Conversations stretched on for hours.

    Nobody seemed to be checking the clock every five minutes.

    One evening, we sat along the waterfront eating paella and fresh seafood while the Mediterranean rolled in beside us.

    The food was incredible.

    But what caught my attention wasn’t what was on the table.

    It was what was happening around it.

    At 10 o’clock at night, kids were still rollerblading along the waterfront.

    Families were still walking together.

    Grandparents sat on benches talking.

    Parents pushed strollers.

    Teenagers gathered with friends.

    The beaches and promenades were alive.

    Not with tourists.

    With people living their lives.

    And nobody seemed stressed about it.

    Nobody was rushing home to collapse on the couch before another workday.

    Nobody looked like they were trying to squeeze an entire life into the few hours left after work.

    They were simply living.

    Outside.

    Together.

    As I watched families enjoying a warm evening by the water long after sunset, I found myself wondering when so many Americans stopped doing that.

    When did “being busy” become more important than being present?

    When did we decide that productivity was more valuable than community?

    When did exhaustion become something to brag about?

    Valencia isn’t perfect.

    No place is.

    But for a few days, I got a glimpse of a different way of living.

    A way that seemed to place a higher value on family, friendship, conversation, and simply enjoying the moment.

    Maybe that’s easier when your dinner doesn’t come from a drive-thru window.

    Maybe it’s easier when the weather cooperates.

    Or maybe they’ve figured out something we’ve forgotten.

    Life isn’t what happens between work obligations.

    Life is the thing we’re supposed to be making time for.

    Scarlett says no.

    Not to hard work.

    But to the idea that being constantly busy is the same thing as living.

  • The Luckiest Thing I Ever Did Was Be Born Where I Was

    The Luckiest Thing I Ever Did Was Be Born Where I Was

    I used to believe that hard work explained most things.

    Not everything.

    But most things.

    Work hard.

    Make good decisions.

    Take responsibility.

    Build a life.

    Then I stood at the Polish border in 2022 watching Ukrainian families arrive with everything they owned packed into a suitcase.

    And I realized how much of my life had been determined before I ever made a single decision.

    The people crossing that border didn’t look much different than the people I know at home.

    They were teachers.

    Accountants.

    Business owners.

    Engineers.

    Grandmothers.

    Parents.

    Kids who should have been worried about homework instead of air raid sirens.

    A few days earlier many of them had homes.

    Jobs.

    Plans.

    Savings accounts.

    Family dinners.

    Normal lives.

    Then someone they had never met decided their country belonged to him.

    That’s all it took.

    One decision made by one man.

    Thousands of miles away from me.

    And suddenly everything changed for them.

    Not because they made bad choices.

    Not because they failed to work hard.

    Not because they didn’t plan well enough.

    Because they were born on one side of a border instead of another.

    That’s it.

    And if that thought doesn’t make you uncomfortable, it should.

    Because Americans love the myth of the self-made person.

    We celebrate success stories.

    We admire hustle.

    We tell ourselves that people get what they earn.

    But standing at that border, I couldn’t stop asking myself a question:

    How much credit do I deserve for being born in Maryland instead of Mariupol?

    I didn’t earn that.

    Neither did they.

    How much credit do I deserve for growing up in a country that wasn’t being bombed?

    For attending schools that remained standing?

    For never having to wonder if a missile would hit my neighborhood?

    For never having to choose between staying home and keeping my children alive?

    The answer is obvious.

    None.

    Yet we walk through life taking ownership of circumstances we had absolutely nothing to do with creating.

    I crossed into Ukraine during that trip for the first time.

    My children didn’t know I was doing it. That wasn’t the plan when I left the states. I was supposed to volunteer at a shelter in Poland.

    Looking back, maybe I didn’t tell them when the plan changed and it was happening, because I wasn’t completely sure I understood it myself.

    I just knew I couldn’t stand at the edge of something this significant and not look beyond the headlines.

    What I saw changed me.

    Not in the dramatic movie-version of changed.

    In a quieter way.

    A more permanent way.

    The kind that settles into your thinking and refuses to leave.

    I’ve returned to Ukraine multiple times since that first trip.

    I’ve visited warehouses.

    Delivered aid.

    Met volunteers.

    Spent the night in a bomb shelter.

    Lived through rolling blackouts and drones flying overhead.

    I also watched communities continue to rebuild.

    Made friendships that continue today.

    And every trip has reinforced the same lesson.

    The distance between “normal life” and “everything changed” is much smaller than most of us want to believe.

    One election.

    One war.

    One illness.

    One accident.

    One economic collapse.

    One natural disaster.

    One terrible day.

    We spend a lot of time judging people based on where they ended up.

    Not enough time asking what happened to them along the way.

    The refugees I met in Poland and Ukraine taught me something I carry with me every day.

    Most people are not living the lives they have because they deserve them.

    They’re living the lives they have because of a complicated combination of effort, opportunity, timing, geography, family, luck, and circumstances.

    Some earned more opportunities.

    Some earned less.

    But nobody started on the same square.

    Nobody.

    That’s not an excuse.

    It’s reality.

    And understanding that reality doesn’t make me feel guilty.

    It makes me feel responsible.

    Responsible for helping when I can.

    Responsible for paying attention.

    Responsible for remembering that every person I meet is carrying a story I cannot see.

    Most of all, responsible for never confusing good fortune with superiority.

    Because the most important thing I learned at the border wasn’t about refugees.

    It was about myself.

    And how easy it is to mistake privilege for achievement.

    Scarlett says no to the myth that everyone starts in the same place.

    To judging people by circumstances we don’t understand.

    And to forgetting that some of the biggest forces shaping our lives were decided long before we arrived.

  • Barcelona Where More Isn’t Always Better

    Barcelona Where More Isn’t Always Better

    Americans are obsessed with growth.

    More customers.

    More houses.

    More tourists.

    More money.

    More.

    More.

    More.

    Then I went back to Barcelona.

    The first time I visited was about 15 years ago. Before Airbnb exploded. Before every spare bedroom, apartment, and broom closet became a vacation rental opportunity.

    I returned in 2025.

    The city was still beautiful.

    The architecture was still stunning.

    The food was still incredible.

    But something felt different.

    For the first time, I found myself paying attention to the people who actually lived there.

    Not the tourists.

    Not the influencers.

    Not the travel bloggers.

    The residents.

    The people trying to afford rent.

    The people trying to raise families.

    The people watching their neighborhoods slowly transform into destinations rather than communities.

    And it got me thinking.

    We celebrate growth as if it’s automatically a good thing.

    But growth for whom?

    At what point does a neighborhood stop being a neighborhood and become a product?

    At what point does “economic opportunity” become “you can no longer afford to live where your family has lived for generations”?

    Those aren’t just Barcelona questions.

    They’re everywhere.

    We’ve seen it in cities.

    We’ve seen it in small towns.

    We’ve seen investors buy homes faster than families can.

    We’ve seen communities transformed into assets.

    We’ve seen people priced out of places they helped build.

    Barcelona just made it impossible to ignore.

    The city is still beautiful.

    But beauty isn’t enough.

    A place isn’t just its buildings.

    It’s the people.

    The culture.

    The history.

    The local businesses.

    The families.

    The community.

    And if those things disappear, what exactly are we preserving?

    Travel is supposed to broaden your perspective.

    Barcelona did exactly that.

    I arrived expecting to admire a city.

    I left wondering whether we’ve become so obsessed with maximizing profit that we’ve forgotten the purpose of communities in the first place.

    Scarlett says no.

    Not to tourism.

    Not to visitors.

    But to the idea that every place on earth should be treated like a commodity.

  • Zimbabwe is a True Community

    Zimbabwe is a True Community

    We talk a lot about independence in America.

    Pull yourself up by your bootstraps.

    Earn your own way.

    Don’t depend on anyone.

    But standing in a rural village in Zimbabwe, I found myself wondering if we’ve confused independence with isolation.

    Because what I saw wasn’t dependence.

    It was community.

    I met a village chief whose job wasn’t to get rich, accumulate power, or win elections. His role was to protect traditions, resolve disputes, care for the land, and help guide the people who lived there.

    Leadership wasn’t about ownership.

    It was about responsibility.

    Then I visited a barn filled with things that most of us would have thrown away.

    Oil cans had become musical instruments.

    Scrap metal had become tools.

    Discarded materials had become artwork and jewelry.

    Nothing was wasted if it could still serve a purpose.

    And honestly? That felt like a lesson far bigger than recycling.

    But the person I can’t stop thinking about wasn’t the chief.

    It was an artist.

    A disabled member of the community sat carving beautiful pieces of art using his feet and the only two fingers he had.

    Think about that for a minute.

    Many of us complain when our Wi-Fi is slow.

    This man creates art with two fingers and his feet.

    The village helps him because he needs help.

    But here’s the part that struck me: he also helps himself.

    He contributes.

    He works.

    He creates.

    He participates.

    Nobody treats him like a burden.

    Nobody pretends he has nothing to offer.

    The community supports him, and he does what he can to support the community in return.

    It wasn’t charity.

    It was belonging.

    And I found myself wondering when so many of us started seeing those as different things.

    Because somewhere along the way, we’ve created a culture that seems obsessed with sorting people into categories.

    Taxpayers.

    Freeloaders.

    Makers.

    Takers.

    Productive.

    Unproductive.

    Deserving.

    Undeserving.

    Yet here was a village that seemed to understand something incredibly simple:

    A community isn’t measured by how it treats the strongest people.

    It’s measured by how it treats everyone.

    The elderly.

    The disabled.

    The struggling.

    The successful.

    The people who need help today and the people who may need help tomorrow.

    Everyone mattered.

    Everyone contributed.

    Everyone belonged.

    I also learned that land in this community isn’t viewed the same way many of us view land.

    Families may use it, farm it, and pass that use to future generations. But the focus isn’t on squeezing every possible dollar from it.

    The focus is stewardship.

    Taking care of something so it remains available for those who come after you.

    Imagine that.

    A society that asks, “What are we responsible for?” before asking, “What’s in it for me?”

    I’m not suggesting Zimbabwe has all the answers.

    No country does.

    But travel has a funny way of exposing assumptions you didn’t realize you were carrying.

    I arrived expecting to learn about wildlife.

    Instead, I left thinking about community.

    About responsibility.

    About belonging.

    And about whether we’ve spent so much time celebrating rugged individualism that we’ve forgotten a basic truth:

    Every single one of us will need help at some point.

    The real question is whether we’ve built communities that still remember how to give it.

    Sometimes the most thought-provoking lessons don’t come from politicians, influencers, billionaires, or people shouting on social media.

    Sometimes they come from a village chief, an artist with two fingers, and a community that never forgot that people are worth more than what they can produce.

    Maybe that’s a lesson worth bringing home.